Quantcast
Channel: Judgments RSS
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18178

Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FCAFC 4

$
0
0
INDUSTRIAL LAW - penalties - whether penalties should be paid to appellant under s 546(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - consideration of the "usual order" that person (or entity) who brings successful contravention proceeding is entitled to be paid any pecuniary penalty imposed - policy considerations - primary judge erred in finding that appellant should not receive payment of penalties because it would deliver a "windfall" - "windfall" principle problematic - payment of penalties to appellant would not deliver "windfall" in any case

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18178

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>