CONSUMER LAW - misleading or deceptive conduct - "poker" machines - whether features of the Dolphin Treasure electronic gaming machine give rise to representations about the odds of winning which are misleading or deceptive - whether representations are made by Crown Melbourne in making the electronic gaming machine available for gambling - whether representations are made by Aristocrat in manufacturing and supplying the machine - consideration of the term "theoretical return to player" - application dismissed
CONSUMER LAW - unconscionable conduct - whether there is a class of gamblers of the Dolphin Treasure electronic gaming machine who are "habituated" or "addicted" to gambling - whether such a class of gamblers are at a "special disadvantage" - consideration of expert evidence concerning the relationship between features of electronic gaming machines and gambling disorder - whether the respondents engaged in unconscionable conduct in making the machine available for play to this class of gamblers - application dismissed
↧