ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - whether the appellant had suffered an "injury" under the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) - distinction between "disease" and "injury" in its primary sense considered - effect of "sudden" or "dramatic" change considered - exclusionary effect of s 10(7) of the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) considered
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - whether the appellant had suffered an "injury" under the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) - whether the adjustment disorders were the same disease - whether the appellant made a "wilful" and "false" representation
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - construction of reasons of Tribunal - whether Tribunal turned its mind to the central issue in contention - effect of reading reasons as a whole
↧