INDUSTRIAL LAW - whether respondent's position was made redundant - whether respondent was redeployed to a "Reasonable alternative position" within the meaning of the Sensis Enterprise Agreement 2014 - whether respondent was offered a "Suitable Position" within the meaning of the Sensis Enterprise Agreement 2014 - whether respondent entitled to a remedy for breach of contract - whether primary judge erred in reversing the onus of proof when considering the questions of whether respondent deployed to "Reasonable alternative position" or offered "Suitable Position" within the meaning of the Sensis Enterprise Agreement 2014
↧