INDUSTRIAL LAW - where applicant made a general protections application to the Fair Work Commission in relation to her dismissal - where Fair Work Commission issued a certificate under s 368(3)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) naming Visionstream Australia Pty Limited as the respondent, rather than the applicant's actual employer, Visionstream Pty Ltd - where applicant subsequently sought to substitute Visionstream Pty Ltd as the respondent to the claim - whether s 368 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) operates so that an application by a dismissed employee to substitute one party for another as a respondent to a general protections application, which the relevant rules of court would otherwise readily allow, must be disallowed when the name of the proposed new respondent is not identical to the name of the party appearing on the certificate issued by the Fair Work Commission under s 368(3)(a)
↧