MIGRATION - refusal of protection visa - appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia - whether primary judge erred in finding that the then Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) complied with its statutory obligations under s 424AA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) in respect of the appellant's oral evidence provided during an entry interview with the Department of Immigration and Border Protection -whether primary judge should have found that the Tribunal did not comply with s 424AA(1)(b)(i) and/or (iii) of the Act and therefore committed jurisdictional error by failing to comply with s 424A of the Act - whether primary judge erred in finding that letters sent by the Tribunal to the appellant were not an invitation within the meaning of s 424(2) of the Act and that s 424(2) has no application to a review applicant - whether, if the requirements of s 424B of the Act applied to the letters, the primary judge erred in finding there was no jurisdictional error - whether primary judge erred in finding that relief should be refused on discretionary grounds because there was no "practical injustice"
Held: appeal dismissed, with costs
↧