MIGRATION - appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia - whether primary judge erred in not holding that the AAT fell into jurisdictional error including for not considering the appellant's claims individually and cumulatively; for failing to adequately deal with the appellant's claim that he had a genuine fear of returning to Sri Lanka; for failing to consider the appellant's risk of harm because of his imputed political opinion; for finding that the appellant was not a person of interest to the Sri Lankan authorities; and for failing to explain why it preferred DFAT reports regarding human rights abuses over other country information - whether SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 applies
Held: appellant's request for an adjournment refused; appeal dismissed with costs
↧