Quantcast
Channel: Judgments RSS
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18178

Commissioner of Taxation v Tamarama Fresh Juices Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 154

$
0
0
TAXATION - whether disclosure of protected material sought by the issue of a subpoena was "necessary...for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of a taxation law" within the meaning of s 355-75 of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (the Act) - whether primary judge erred in finding that disclosure was necessary for such a purpose - whether subpoena seeking disclosure of protected material ought to be set aside - consideration of factors relevant to deciding whether disclosure is "necessary" under the Act - differences between compulsory disclosure and voluntary disclosure by an officer under the Act- application for leave to appeal granted - appeal allowed

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 18178

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>