PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - whether costs order made in favour of applicant in earlier proceeding can be set off against costs order made against applicant in cross-claim in same proceeding - whether the Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction to order the set-off - whether debt appropriation order based on the cross-claim costs order can be set aside - where first respondent allegedly failed to disclose that the purported assignment of the costs order was subject to challenge in related proceedings
↧