PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for no case to answer - Whether respondent required to elect whether to call evidence before making no case application - Respondent not required to elect whether or not to call evidence -Whether respondent had case to answer in respect of substantive application - Where large parts of amended statement of claim objected to or no longer relied on and applicant led no evidence other than her own affidavit - Application for strike out of amended statement of claim - Amended statement of claim struck out in its entirety - Substantive application dismissed
INDUSTRIAL LAW - Where applicant claimed breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) related to direction by respondent to receive COVID-19 vaccination - Where applicant refused to receive COVID-19 vaccination - claim of religious reasons
↧
