CONSUMER LAW - the third respondent published on its website a list of conditions which had been imposed by the first respondent on the practice of the applicant as a registered pharmacist - the applicant alleged that the imposition and publication of the conditions comprised misleading or deceptive conduct and gave rise to defamatory imputations - the applicant alleged that the second respondent was accessorily liable - whether there was an evidentiary foundation for making the claim against the second respondent - whether the applicant's claim against the second respondent should be summarily dismissed under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
↧